Two FBI intelligence analysts based in Atlanta have been fired after they refused to participate in the Trump administration's investigation into Georgia's 2020 presidential election. The pair, who happen to be a married couple (nothing like getting terminated together to really test those wedding vows), told colleagues they believed the investigation was not justified under FBI and Justice Department policies. According to The American Tribune, the two were escorted out of their office, which is the workplace equivalent of being walked to your car after a bad breakup.
The FBI, ever the masters of saying nothing while technically saying something, neither confirmed nor denied the firings. A bureau spokesperson told MS NOW, "The FBI will always investigate credible allegations of matters related to federal elections." The spokesperson added, "Every employee at this FBI is to uphold our mission and adhere to our standards, any deviation will not be tolerated." So basically, do what you are told or find a new place to hang your lanyard.
Here is where things get interesting. On July 2, 2026, FBI Director Kash Patel ordered 260 intelligence analysts from across the country to set aside time for what was called a "priority investigation" in Atlanta. Multiple sources confirmed this was a probe into Georgia's 2020 election. After securing a judge's order, the bureau seized 600 boxes of ballots and other election materials. Six hundred boxes. That is a lot of paper to sift through six years after an election.
The FBI affidavit supporting the search warrant reportedly contained claims about possible fraud, though MS NOW noted these claims had already been "debunked" by GOP-led probes in Georgia. The memo directing analysts to participate required each one to complete 708 record checks by July 17, which is a fun two-week deadline for what sounds like the world's least exciting homework assignment.
One source revealed that analysts in one FBI field office received a spreadsheet with 175,000 names and dates of birth and were instructed to run them through a commercial database to determine if those people were still alive and to find current addresses. Meanwhile, a federal judge rejected a DOJ subpoena seeking voter names and other information in Georgia, calling it "unreasonable." When a federal judge uses the word unreasonable, that is judge-speak for "absolutely not."
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, sent a letter to Director Patel and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche criticizing the investigation. "This diversion of significant FBI resources towards a political investigation threatens the purpose of its mission and endangers Americans," the letter stated.
Under current DOJ guidelines, the FBI is only supposed to conduct investigations when agents can point to specific facts that reasonably indicate an actual or potential federal crime or national security threat. Whether relitigating a six-year-old election meets that bar is apparently a matter of some debate, at least among married couples who used to work in the Atlanta field office.
Read more American news stories at: The American Tribune
