DNC Made Leaders Sign NDAs Before Showing Them the Books

DNC Made Leaders Sign NDAs Before Showing Them the Books

dnc-made-leaders-sign-ndas-before-showing-them-the-books.jpg


When your own senior leadership has to sign a non-disclosure agreement before they are allowed to look at the party finances, you are not running a political organization. You are running a support group. As USA Journal reported, the Democratic National Committee required its senior officers to sign NDAs before a closed-door meeting on June 25 about party money. These are not interns. These are the highest-ranking operational leaders in the party, and the DNC essentially told them to pinky swear before opening the spreadsheet.

The financials explain why. Through the end of May, the DNC had about $15 million on hand and $18 million in debt. That puts them at negative $3 million. Meanwhile, the Republican National Committee was sitting on $125 million in cash with zero debt. That is not a gap. That is a different sport entirely. One team showed up in cleats and the other showed up in socks, and now they want everyone to keep quiet about the socks.

DNC Chair Ken Martin has been working overtime on the spin cycle. On Pod Save America, he insisted that suggestions the party is not raising money are "inaccurate" and argued the real issue is not how much comes in but how much goes out. That is the political equivalent of saying your bank account is fine because you are really good at spending. A party that is $3 million in the hole with four months until Election Day does not get to reframe the conversation around expenditure philosophy.

The timing got worse, too. The Supreme Court recently lifted caps on how much parties can spend in coordination with candidates and allowed parties to buy campaign ads at the same discounted broadcast rates individual campaigns pay. Analysts on both sides recognized this for what it is: a massive structural advantage for whichever party has more cash. That would be the Republicans, who have $125 million more than the DNC if you are keeping score, and someone at the DNC clearly is because they made everyone sign paperwork before discussing it.

The ruling landed five days after the secret NDA meeting. So the DNC gathered its leaders behind closed doors to quietly discuss a financial crater, and less than a week later the rules changed to make having money even more important. That is some world-class timing.

Healthy organizations do not force their own officers to sign confidentiality agreements before reviewing the budget. Your local PTA does not do this. Your bowling league does not do this. You do this when the numbers are so bad that the act of revealing them to your own team poses an existential public relations risk. The midterms are in November. Democrats need money for House races, Senate pickups, and every competitive district where the margin is measured in ad buys. The RNC has a war chest. The DNC has a nondisclosure agreement and a negative bank balance. One of those things wins elections. The other one does not.

Read more conservative news commentary at: USA Journal News
 
Tired of ads? Go ad-free — $4/mo →
👑 CRANKERS GOLD
  • No ads, ever
  • Trash Talk in the Comments
  • Give 💀 Reactions
  • It's Better than Working
  • Meet New Friends
Join Gold — $4/month

or $40/year · cancel anytime

Back
Top