The Republican Party is fracturing right before our eyes over whether Anthony Fauci should face real consequences, and the drama is absolutely wild.
Sen. Rand Paul is charging full speed ahead with a criminal contempt referral against the former White House COVID adviser, but two members of his own party are throwing cold water on the whole thing, as Trending Politics reported. That's right, friendly fire from within the GOP.
Here's the juicy setup. Paul, the Kentucky Republican, declared on Tuesday that he has enough votes to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress after the former health official repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment rights during questioning. Instead of going through a full Senate vote that would require 60 senators to agree, Paul is exploring a clever workaround. He wants to send the referral straight to the Justice Department, potentially having Vice President JD Vance certify the resolution himself.
Sen. Josh Hawley is fully on board, telling Fox News Digital that his team is actively drafting a legal memo for acting Attorney General Todd Blanche pushing for prosecution. Hawley's argument is spicy and simple: Fauci already received a sweeping pardon from former President Joe Biden covering actions between January 1, 2014 and January 19, 2025. So claiming testimony could lead to criminal exposure? That logic doesn't hold up when you've already been pardoned, Hawley insists.
But then come the party poopers.
Sen. James Lankford is waving a giant red flag about Paul's procedural shortcut. He warned that bypassing the full Senate could come back to haunt Republicans big time. If Vance changes how the Senate operates now, Democrats could use that exact same playbook against conservatives three years down the road. "That's the challenge," Lankford cautioned.
Meanwhile, Sen. Mike Rounds is questioning whether Republicans have even built a solid legal foundation for contempt in the first place. He pointed out that Fauci took the Fifth, which actually makes it harder to argue he was defying Congress. Rounds also urged his colleagues to remember the chaos and uncertainty of those early pandemic days, noting that officials were working with whatever information they had at the time.
On the other side, Sen. Ashley Moody backed Paul's push, arguing that the dispute over Fauci's Fifth Amendment claim needs to land in front of a judge. She suggested that court clarification is probably necessary going forward.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee already voted to hold Fauci in contempt on Thursday with an 8 to 5 tally. Under normal procedures, the resolution would head to the full chamber next.
Paul has shown zero signs of backing off. That means JD Vance and the Justice Department may soon face a massive decision: can a presidential pardon and Fifth Amendment claims shield someone from congressional accountability entirely?
This internal GOP battle is heating up fast, and Fauci is sitting right at the center of the firestorm.
Read more breaking news stories at: Trending Politics News
