California's golden boy Gavin Newsom is watching his 2028 presidential ambitions get progressively more awkward, kind of like showing up to a party where everyone already knows your secrets. As Conservative Brief reported, the governor is under growing scrutiny for his legendary use of something called "behested payments," which is basically a fancy legal term for "give money to things I like and maybe good stuff happens for you later."
Here's where the numbers get absolutely wild. Since 2011, Newsom has reported over $347 million in these totally legal, nothing to see here donations. That accounts for roughly 62% of ALL behested payments reported by every single elected official in the entire state of California during that period. The statewide total was about $556 million, meaning one guy vacuumed up nearly two thirds of the whole pie. Former Governor Jerry Brown, by comparison, managed a modest $35 million during his time in office. Brown was apparently playing checkers while Newsom invented a whole new board game.
Political strategist Dan Schnur pointed out to the Orange County Register that Newsom has leaned on this fundraising mechanism far more aggressively than any of his colleagues. You think?
The plot thickens when you look at where some of that cash landed. Approximately $4.8 million went to the California Partners Project, a nonprofit co-founded by First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom. Critics say that arrangement has all the optics of a conflict of interest wearing a trench coat and sunglasses.
Then there are the donors who seemed to do pretty well for themselves afterward. Blue Shield reportedly contributed $20 million to Newsom's pet initiatives during the pandemic, then conveniently snagged a no-bid state contract for vaccine distribution. Kaiser Foundation kicked in close to $10 million before landing a major role in the state's Medi-Cal program. The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria also donated millions to organizations connected to the governor and his wife before benefiting from state decisions on tribal gaming. Pure coincidence, obviously.
Sean McMorris from California Common Cause called behested payments "ripe for abuse," noting that officials frequently solicit from entities doing business with the government. Assemblyman David Tangipa went further, calling the whole thing political influence peddling and arguing that just because something is legal doesn't make it ethical. Revolutionary concept, truly.
Meanwhile, Newsom has confirmed that both he and his wife are subjects of multiple federal investigations, though neither has been charged with anything. The DOJ hasn't spilled any details publicly. Newsom also recently forked over a $31,500 ethics fine for being late on disclosing certain behested payments, which relative to $347 million is like getting a parking ticket on a stolen yacht.
Supporters insist these donations funded wildfire relief, education, healthcare, and other genuinely good causes. Critics counter that noble outcomes don't erase concerns about transparency when powerful interests can write unlimited checks to a governor's favorite charities. The whole saga raises the eternal question in California politics: just because you can, does that mean you should?
Like what you see? Then sign up for our Free Newsletter
