Close Menu
  • News & Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Culture Wars
  • Videos
  • Forums
What's Hot

Trump Axes “Woke” Education Dept in Stunning Power Move

June 23, 2026

Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson Hides the Homeless Ahead of FIFA World Cup

June 9, 2026

California Faces Federal Election Probe Amid Voter Fraud

June 9, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
CrankersCrankers
  • News & Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Culture Wars
  • Videos
  • Forums
Newsletter
CrankersCrankers
Home ยป Three of the biggest food delivery companies have SUED New York City over restaurant fees
News & Politics

Three of the biggest food delivery companies have SUED New York City over restaurant fees

By drastic215December 15, 2021Updated:November 8, 202504
Share Facebook Twitter Copy Link LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp Threads
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link Threads

(Crankers) Grubhub, DoorDash, and Uber Eats decided to sue the city of New York for putting a cap on the prices they can charge restaurants. The complaint says that the fee caps could harm the business of food-delivery apps. The capping rules were made permanent back in August.

Apps can’t charge more than 23% per order. According to The Verge , the percentages are 15 percent for delivery, 5% for listing restaurants on available platforms, and 3% for credit card processing fees.

The companies have decided to fight the new capping rules, inspired by a similar situation in San Francisco. A matching cap was set in this city earlier this year, prompting pushback from DoorDash. In July, that app and Grubhub filed a lawsuit against San Francisco, and Mayor London Breed decided not to sign the law.

NYC Councilman Mark Gjonaj, a chairman of the small business committee, spoke to the Wall Street Journal. He emphasized that laws were introduced to bring fairness to the system that often lacks it.

A Grubhub spokesman said that the services had worked very hard during the last year or so, trying to support restaurants across the county and New York City. The fee cap would result in the reduction of orders for both couriers and restaurants.

The lawyers share a similar view, pointing out that the regulation is unconstitutional, harmful, and unnecessary.

Get CRANKERS by email:
Powered by follow.it

Read this news story next

Here are few more news stories you might like. Please like, comment, and share when you have time. Come back later to read more news.
  • Candace Owens wasn’t invited to speak at Charlie Kirk memorial
  • Hillary Clinton says to stop demonizing each other, then demonizes Republicans
  • Elizabeth Warren puts pregnant women in danger with rhetoric about Trump and Tylenol
  • 170+ businesses in progressive city beg for help against crime
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link Threads
drastic215
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)

Kutztown University alumni who enjoys gaming, sports, building websites and optimizing ads for successful businesses. Other than that, just your typical northeast Philly family guy! Go Birds!

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Top Posts

Musk’s DOGE TERMINATED massive $18 million per month empty facility scandal

November 11, 202511,629 Views

Trump announces $2k checks for SOME Americans – are you on the list?

November 11, 20259,362 Views

Food stamp fraud is freaking crazy, SNAP causes billions in losses

November 18, 20256,075 Views
RSS Crankers Videos
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Work with Us
  • About
  • Terms of Service
  • Diversity Policy
  • Ethics Policy
  • Corrections Policy
  • Ownership / Funding
  • Publishing principles
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram TikTok RSS
© 2026 Crankers News Network

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.