Close Menu
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Culture & Society
  • Videos
What's Hot

Selena Gomez’s mother-in-law’s CA home raided by thugs while she was inside

November 27, 2025

Two Dems claim they were PEPPER-SPRAYED during anti-ICE protests

November 27, 2025

Jails brace for surge of inmates as Iryna’s Law kicks in

November 27, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Crankers
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
  • Culture & Society
  • Videos
Facebook
Crankers
Home » Arizona Judge gives Democrats bad news, rules in favor of Trump-supporters
Politics

Arizona Judge gives Democrats bad news, rules in favor of Trump-supporters

By drastic215May 3, 2022Updated:November 8, 202500
Share Facebook Twitter Copy Link LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp Threads
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link Threads

(Crankers) Lawsuits seeking to disqualify three Republican lawmakers from this year’s ballot have been dismissed by a judge in Phoenix. Those lawsuits were made because these three lawmakers participated in or helped organize the Jan. 6, 2021, rally in Washington that led to an unprecedented attack on Congress.
After making this decision public from Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Christopher Coury, it means that Reps. Paul Gosar and Andy Biggs and state Rep. Mark Finchem remain on the primary ballot barring a reversal by the state Supreme Court. Finchem is running for Secretary of State, Arizona’s chief election officer, while Gosar and Biggs are seeking reelection.
The lawsuits filed on behalf of a handful of Arizona voters alleged that Gosar, Biggs and Finchem can’t hold office because they participated in an insurrection, citing a section of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. constitution enacted after the Civil War, per report.
In the actual attack on Congress that was intended to stop the certification of President Joe Biden’s win, none of the lawmakers are accused of participating in it.
The lawmakers’ attorneys said Congress created no enforcement mechanism for the 14th Amendment, barring a criminal conviction, with which Coury agreed. He noted that Congress proposed such a law in the wake of the attack on Congress but it is not been enacted.
“Therefore, given the current state of the law and in accordance with the United States Constitution, plaintiffs have no private right of action to assert claims under the disqualification clause,” wrote Coury.
“The text of the Constitution is mandatory. It sets forth the single arbiter of the qualifications of members of Congress; that single arbiter is Congress,” he added.

Get CRANKERS by email:
Powered by follow.it
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link Threads
drastic215
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)

Kutztown University alumni who enjoys gaming, sports, building websites and optimizing ads for successful businesses. Other than that, just your typical northeast Philly family guy! Go Birds!

Add A Comment

Comments are closed.

Top Posts

Musk’s DOGE TERMINATED massive $18 million per month empty facility scandal

November 11, 202511,310 Views

Trump announces $2k checks for SOME Americans – are you on the list?

November 11, 20258,801 Views

Food stamp fraud is freaking crazy, SNAP causes billions in losses

November 18, 20255,916 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Funny Shirtz
funny shirtz
RSS Crankers Videos
  • Hillary: "The press needs a consistent narrative about the danger Trump is"
  • Judge Hannah Dugan shown ON VIDEO committing a crime with illegal immigrant
  • National Guard shooter identified as AFGHAN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT
  • Seditious Behavior CONTINUES: Billboards encouraging Members of the Military to DEFECT
  • Selena Gomez’s mother-in-law's home raided by thugs in California
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Work with Us
  • About
  • Terms of Service
  • Diversity Policy
  • Ethics Policy
  • Corrections Policy
  • Ownership / Funding
  • Publishing principles
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram TikTok RSS
© 2025 Crankers News Network

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.