Close Menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Videos
What's Hot

WOW! Kristi Noem Announces $10,000 Bonus Checks for TSA Officers

November 14, 2025

Headcase hypocrite Elizabeth Warren lectures people about being wealthy while flying private jets only a rich person could afford

November 14, 2025

Bernie and AOC wasted $15,000 an hour on private jets to FIGHT THE OLIGARCHY

November 14, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Crankers
  • Home
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Videos
Facebook
Crankers
Home » Y’all better get a job, because Supreme Court told Trump he can pause $4 billion in SNAP
News

Y’all better get a job, because Supreme Court told Trump he can pause $4 billion in SNAP

By drastic215November 14, 2025Updated:November 14, 20250258
Share Facebook Twitter Copy Link LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp Threads
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link Threads

(Crankers) All the millions of people who are milking the SNAP system better start taking showers and filling out job applications. Now I’m not against people using the system WHEN THEY NEED HELP, but I am 100% against people LIVING OFF THE SYSTEM because they refuse to work for a better life.

Older people, people with disabilities, and anyone who needs temporary help – you’re fine. I hope you get the help you need.

But if you’re some big back chick who spends all of her money on fake nails and fake eyelashes and you have 12 kids and refuse to get a job, then this is for you. You need to get off your butt and GO TO WORK.

Here’s what happened that has the welfare queens up in arms this week. And I’m talking to you because you keep posting videos of yourselves stealing from stores because you don’t want to work, but you’re clearly able-bodied and can work, but you’re lazy and taking my tax money and that annoys me.

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to temporarily withhold approximately $4 billion in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) payments, issuing an emergency stay that pauses a lower-court order requiring full funding of November benefits during the ongoing federal government shutdown.

The stay was issued by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who oversees emergency matters for the First Circuit. The decision does not resolve the underlying legal dispute but permits the administration to continue its partial freeze of SNAP benefits while the case proceeds through the appeals process.

The dispute began earlier this month when a federal district judge in Rhode Island ordered the administration to fully fund November SNAP payments, ruling that low-income families would experience “irreparable harm” if benefits were delayed or reduced. The judge said the government had lawful authority to use contingency funds to keep SNAP payments at their normal levels despite the shutdown.

The Trump administration immediately appealed the ruling, arguing that complying with the district judge’s order would violate budgetary limits and potentially force the redirection of funds intended for other programs. Administration lawyers told the court that the order “intruded on executive authority” and disrupted federal resource management during a period without congressional appropriations.

The Supreme Court’s emergency stay grants the administration temporary relief while the First Circuit evaluates the case on an expedited schedule. In practical terms, the decision allows the government to continue withholding full November SNAP payments, affecting an estimated 42 million Americans who rely on the program for food assistance.

Following the stay, the U.S. Department of Agriculture instructed states to halt or reverse full SNAP disbursements that may have already been issued in response to the lower-court ruling, calling those payments “unauthorized.” Several state agencies have reported confusion over how to adjust benefits already released to recipients.

The pause comes amid the longest federal government shutdown in U.S. history, during which numerous agencies and programs have been disrupted due to lapsed funding. SNAP typically requires annual appropriations from Congress, though emergency contingency funds can be used during short-term funding lapses. Whether those funds can legally be deployed during a prolonged shutdown is at the center of the current dispute.

The case raises broader constitutional questions about executive authority during a shutdown, including how far the federal government may go in delaying or redistributing funds when congressional appropriations have expired. Advocacy groups warn that the pause will have immediate consequences for millions of low-income households, including families with children, seniors, and individuals with disabilities.

The appeals court is expected to issue a decision in the coming weeks. If Congress passes new government funding in the meantime, the legal battle may become moot. Until then, states and recipients remain uncertain about when full SNAP benefits will resume.

Read this next

Here are few more stories you might like. Please like, comments, and share when you have time. Come back later to see what we published next.
  • Hegseth Announces Surprise Military Operation And The Bad Guys Better Get Ready
  • New Epstein Logs Show Direct Contact With Bannon And It’s Worse Than You Think
  • AOC tried taking down Trump, got smacked with truth bombs instead
  • Jasmine Crockett exposed herself after blaming GOP for something DEMOCRATS Did
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link Threads
drastic215
  • Website
  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)

Kutztown University alumni who enjoys gaming, sports, building websites and optimizing ads for successful businesses. Other than that, just your typical northeast Philly family guy! Go Birds!

Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Musk’s DOGE TERMINATED massive $18 million per month empty facility scandal

November 11, 20259,361 Views

Trump announces $2k checks for SOME Americans – are you on the list?

November 11, 20257,096 Views

Elizabeth Warren accepted $822,573 from sources linked to pharmaceutical companies

September 5, 20253,235 Views
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Funny Shirtz
funny shirtz
RSS Crankers Videos
  • Jasmine Crockett eats crow after by CNN sets her straight
  • Jasmine Crockett mocks MAGA women while standing next to a massive dude in a dress
  • AOC proves how stupid she is when talking about Jeffrey Epstein
  • LA accused of wasting another $450 million on failure
  • VP Vance explains the obvious reason the housing market sucks
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Work with Us
  • About
  • Terms of Service
  • Diversity Policy
  • Ethics Policy
  • Corrections Policy
  • Ownership / Funding
  • Publishing principles
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram TikTok RSS
© 2025 Crankers News Network

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.